I had dinner this week with a 73-year-old widow who runs a flower export business she built after her husband died some years ago. She told her stories with the calm of someone who had been doing this her whole life, except that she had not. Until very recently she was, in her own word, una pasajera, a passenger in someone else's story.
The same week, a 49-year-old founder told me he could not commit capital for five years because he might be dead by then. He is perfectly healthy, with a wife and two kids, and he believed what he was saying.
I have been reading those conversations wrong for years.
The Signal
When liquidity preference is identity protection
I have spent years reading the 49-year-old's hesitation as risk tolerance, and I have come to believe that reading is wrong. The cost of getting it wrong is enormous.
The 49-year-old has spent two decades becoming someone. He has a title, a calendar, a marriage shaped around the business, and kids who know him as the builder. The capital is not separate from him; it is part of the architecture of the self he has built. A 5-year commitment is not a financial question. It is a bet that the person he is today will still be that person in 2031, and because he cannot honestly answer that, he stays liquid and tells himself it is prudence.
The widow could not have made that argument. She had nothing left to defend, because the version of herself she had spent forty years protecting was already gone. At 73, she took the offer her flowers were giving her, and she went.
This is the same pattern that turns retirees into great investors. The operator's ego dies, and the capital is finally free to compound without having to defend a self. Howard Marks writes that temperament matters more than IQ in investing, and he is right, but I think the deeper variable is what the capital is being asked to protect.
Look at this through the Diamond. On Team, I cannot underwrite a 5-year deal with a partner who cannot think in 5-year increments, because the constraint is not capital but the investor's relationship with his own future self. On Structure, the right stack for a 49-year-old is not a longer lockup with more upside; it is one with a liquidity tranche that honors who he is now and a growth tranche that lets him become someone else by 2031 without his current self having to pay the price.
Capital that defends identity is capital wearing armor, and armor cannot compound because it is busy holding still. The widow at 73 runs faster than the founder at 49 because she took the armor off.
The person with the most to protect is the one who ages the fastest.
The Data
Almost half (48%) of North American family offices now cite "improving liquidity" as their primary investment objective, with de-risking portfolios second at 33% (RBC and Campden Wealth, October 2025). These are families with average wealth of $2 billion. Even at that scale, the institutional version of the 49-year-old is asking the same question and giving the same answer. Identity protection has a name when it shows up on a survey, and that name is "improving liquidity."
In KKR's 2026 Outlook, Henry McVey writes that the current environment calls not for derisking but for what he calls High Grading: upgrading portfolios, capital structures, and counterparties to emphasize resilience and quality as the cycle matures, and that the cost to High Grade one's portfolio is extremely low today (KKR Global Macro and Asset Allocation, November 2025). The capital that stays liquid out of caution is paying full price to miss the upgrade window.
Apollo's 2026 Private Equity Outlook names something most allocators feel but rarely say out loud: the temptation to pause commitments amid light DPI (Apollo Global Management, December 2025). Apollo's view is that if public market returns settle lower from today's elevated starting point, the illiquidity premium (the extra return earned for accepting longer duration) widens rather than narrows. The cost of staying liquid is going up at the precise moment many investors are reaching for it.
Foreign buyers purchased $4.4 billion of South Florida residential real estate in 2025, with Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, and Mexico accounting for over 45% of international transactions in Q1 (Miami Association of Realtors, January 2026). A Brickell condo is an asset the founder can see, and an LP position is one he has to trust. Most Latin American capital still chooses what it can see, and then calls the difference a preference.
Ahmad’s Margin Note
I was at the Bakehouse last week, watching Joseph Schwarzkopf get introduced to the board with his father, the founder, in the room. What floored me was the dedication. The commissioner of Miami got his full attention, and five minutes later, someone's plus one got the same eye contact, the same warmth, the same five minutes.
In the age of AI, everyone is polishing the same memo with access to the same models. Critical thinking decides which rooms are worth walking into. Relationships are how the work actually moves. Joseph was doing both, and the room felt it.
The machine can write the memo. It cannot walk into the Bakehouse.
The Infinity⁹ Insider grows the way good deals grow: through trust, not advertising. If this issue sharpened your thinking, share it with one person who would value it. They can subscribe here.
This Week on YouTube
I sat down with Tero Moliis, Finnish-born serial entrepreneur, TEDx speaker, EdTech and gamification specialist, published game designer, and author of Life Is A Sandcastle. Based in Monterrey, Mexico, Tero has spent his career at the intersection of business development, game design, and education, mentoring founders and teaching at the university level along the way.